Systematic Meta Analyses Randomized Trials -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Systematic Meta Analyses Randomized Trials? Answer: Introduction The discussion is true in identifying the conduction of randomized controlled trials as the common scientific procedure for determining the effectiveness of the psychological interventions that are applied upon patients. This can be confirmed by the fact that RCTs provide reliable scientific evidence by eliminating different forms of spurious causality in the results (Bolier et al. 2013). Effects of psychological interventions are most often undetectable when applied on a single or group of individuals. However, studying the effects systematically on a larger population helps to determine the results in a better way. Statements present in the discussion against RCT are confirmed by the fact that the complexity of all biological organisms contribute to differences in their response to stimulus, thereby resulting in unreliable clinical reports. However, the discussion is true in identifying the pitfalls of randomized controlled trials (Deaton and Cartwright 2017). These trials most often fail to achieve heterogeneity among the respondents. Furthermore, in order to achieve statistically significant results, the trials should be conducted on larger population. Moreover, accuracy of the discussion is also established by the fact that practitioner related moderators are found to contribute and directly influence therapeutic outcomes by fostering sense of self-efficacy and h ope in the patients (da Costa and Jni 2014). Furthermore, social impairment, distress and ability of researchers to verbalise feelings, while conducting an RCT may also produce misleading results. Thus, it can be said that the discussion was appropriate in illustrating the limitations of RCTs in psychotherapies. Therefore, there is a need to conduct large scale research in order to estimate psychotherapy outcomes on a population. References Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G.J., Riper, H., Smit, F. and Bohlmeijer, E., 2013. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.BMC public health,13(1), p.119. da Costa, B.R. and Jni, P., 2014. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.European heart journal,35(47), pp.3336-3345. Deaton, A. and Cartwright, N., 2017. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.Social Science Medicine. Retrieved from- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617307359